NEWPORT — The ACLU has appealed to the Vermont Supreme Court on behalf of a Vermont couple who were prosecuted following an August 2018 “roving patrol” stop by a U.S. Border Patrol agent in Jay.
In State v. Lena-Butterfield & Walker-Brazie, the Court will be asked to determine whether a person can be convicted on state charges based on evidence federal agents obtained in a manner that violated the protections afforded by Article 11 of the Vermont Constitution.
On August 12, 2018, Brandi Lena-Butterfield and Phillip Walker-Brazie were driving west on Vermont Route 105 toward their home in Richford when a Border Patrol Agent stopped the couple’s vehicle and asked to search it.
The couple refused to consent to a search.
Without obtaining a warrant and over the couple’s objections, the agent ordered them from the car and conducted a search.
The resulting evidence, less than 5 ounces of marijuana and mushrooms, was turned over to a Vermont State Trooper, and Ms. Lena-Butterfield and Mr. Walker-Brazie were subsequently charged with possession by the Orleans County State’s Attorney’s office.
The ACLU contends that the search would have violated Vermont’s Constitution if conducted by a state official, and therefore the evidence cannot be used in a state prosecution.
Vermont’s Constitution requires that to search a vehicle without a warrant, an officer must have either consent or probable cause plus urgent circumstances, neither of which were present in this case.
The Border Patrol claims the authority to conduct “roving patrol” vehicle stops and searches in the interior of the country, but those stops must be based on “reasonable suspicion” of an immigration violation, and searches require “probable cause.”
“When a vehicle is stopped in Vermont and the evidence is used by Vermont prosecutors, in a Vermont Court, then the Vermont Constitution should apply,” said ACLU of Vermont Staff Attorney Lia Ernst. “To allow otherwise would allow local prosecutors to effectively do an end run around our constitution and remove an important check on the Border Patrol.
The ACLU of Vermont will be filing its opening brief in State v. Lena-Butterfield & Walker-Brazie in the coming months.
WITHOUT PROBABIL CAUSE THE REACTION OF THIS BOARDER PATROL OFFICER SHOULD BE NOTED AND FUTURE STOPS ACQUIRE THE PROPER PROCEDURES BY LAW AN IF NOT FORFEIT THE STOP AND WHAT WAS FOUND IN THE VEHICLE.US.OR OTHERS HAVE SIGNIFICANT WRITES ON THESE UNLAWFUL STOPS WHICH SIGNIFICANTLY GIVES THE BOARDER PATROL AGENT’S A BAD NAME???